[Effectiveness on adherence to biological drugs and experience of a pharmaceutical intervention based on CMO model in patients with rheumatic disease (AdhER-2 study)].

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the effectiveness on adherence to treatment with biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b-DMARD) and experience with providers of healthcare of a CMO pharmaceutical intervention care model in subjects with rheu-matoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis stratified according to their needs. METHOD: Prospective, single-centre randomized controlled study. The study period was eleven months. Non-compliant patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondy-litis treated with b-DMARD were included. Patients were randomized to a control (CG) or intervention group (IG) who received regular or the CMO pharmaceutical intervention model treatment, respec-tively. Baseline and final adherence were determined using medication possession ratio, the Compliance Questionnaire on Rheu-matology, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. To assess baseline and final patient experience with providers of healthcare we applied the Chronic Patient Experience Assessment Instrument (IEXPAC). RESULTS: For the IG, one patient (5.6%) was categorized as priority 1, nine (50.0%) as priority 2, and eight (44.4%) as priority 3. Ninety pharmaceutical interventions were carried out (5.1±1.8 interventions / patient). At the end of the study, the IG showed higher fre-quency of patients who adhered to the pharmaceutical intervention (77.8 vs 18.8%; p=0.002) and higher mean IEXPAC score (7.6±1.3 vs 5.8±1.1; p <0.001) in comparison to the CG. Conclusion The CMO pharmaceutical intervention model significantly improves patient adherence to b-DMARD and their experience with the providers of healthcare.

Eficacia de una intervención farmacéutica basada en el modelo CMO sobre la adherencia a fármacos biológicos y la experiencia del pacientecon enfermedad reumática (Estudio ADhER-2) / Effectiveness on adherence to biological drugs and experience of a pharmaceutical intervention based on CMO model in patients with rheumatic disease (AdhER-2 study)

Fundamento: Analizar la eficacia de una intervención farmacéutica basada en el modelo CMO sobre la adherencia a fármacos biológicos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME-b) y sobre la experiencia con los profesionales y servicios sanitarios de pacientescon artritis reumatoide, artritis psoriásica y espondilitis anquilosante estratificados según sus necesidades de atención. Material y métodos: Estudio experimental prospectivo, unicéntrico y controlado de once meses de duración. Se incluyeron pacientes con artritis reumatoide, artritis psoriásica y espondilitis anquilosante no adherentes a FAME-b. Se aleatorizaron en grupo control (GC) e intervención (GI), que recibieron atención farmacéutica habitual o basada en CMO, respectivamente. La adherencia basaly final se calculó mediante la ratio media de posesión de medicamentos y las puntuaciones obtenidas en Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology y en Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Para valorar la experiencia basal y final de los pacientes con los profesionales y servicios sanitarios se utilizó el instrumento de Evaluaciónde la Experiencia del Paciente Crónico (IEXPAC). Resultados: En el GI (n=18), solo un paciente fue estratificado como prioridad 1 (5,6%), nueve se estratificaron como prioridad2 (50,0%) y ocho como prioridad 3 (44,4%). Se realizaron 90 intervenciones farmacéuticas (5,1±1,8 intervenciones por paciente). Al finalizar el estudio, el GI mostró respecto del GC más pacientes adherentes (77,8 vs 18,8%; p=0,002) y mayor puntuación IEXPAC (7,6±1,3 vs 5,8±1,1; p <0,001). Conclusiones: La intervención farmacéutica basada en el modelo CMO mejoró significativamente la adherencia a FAME-b y la experiencia de los pacientes con los profesionales y el sistema sanitario.(AU)

Background: We aimed to assess the effectiveness on adherence to treatment with biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (b-DMARD) and experience with providers of healthcare of a CMO pharmaceutical intervention care model in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis stratified according to their needs. Method: Prospective, single centre randomized controlled study. The study period was eleven months. Non compliant patients withrheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondy litis treated with b-DMARD were included. Patients were randomized to a control (CG) or intervention group (IG) who receivedregular or the CMO pharmaceutical intervention model treatment, respectively. Baseline and final adherence were determined using medication possession ratio, the Compliance Questionnaire onRheumatology, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. To assess baseline and final patient experience with providers of healthcare we applied the Chronic Patient Experience Assessment Instrument (IEXPAC). Results: For the IG, one patient (5.6%) was categorized as priority1, nine (50.0%) as priority 2, and eight (44.4%) as priority 3. Ninety pharmaceutical interventions were carried out (5.1±1.8 interventions / patient). At the end of the study, the IG showed higherfrequency of patients who adhered to the pharmaceutical intervention (77.8 vs 18.8%; p=0.002) and higher mean IEXPAC score (7.6±1.3 vs 5.8±1.1; p <0.001) in comparison to the CG. Conclusion: The CMO pharmaceutical intervention model significantly improves patient adherence to b-DMARD and their experience with the providers of healthcare.(AU)

[Adherence to biological therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. (Study ADhER-1)]. / Adherencia terapéutica a fármacos biológicos en pacientes con artritis reumatoide, artritis psoriásica y espondilitis anquilosante. (Estudio ADhER-1).

BACKGROUND: To quantify adherence to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) and to determine the factors that can predict adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis in daily clinical practice. METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and single-center study was carried out. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis who were in treatment with subcutaneous biological DMARD were included. Variables related to socioeconomic status, disease, biological therapy and safety were recorded. Adherence was calculated by using medication possession ratio, Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale Questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients and 6 different biological DMARDs were included. Mean age was 56.8±13.2 years and 52.7% were women. The percentage of adherent patients was 59.3% in rheumatoid arthritis, 62.5% in psoriatic arthritis and 76.2% in ankylosing spondylitis. Lesser adherence was associated with the administration of the drug by a family member and/or caregiver (odds ratio: 9.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-61.8 (p <.05)). There were no differences between adherent and non-adherent patients in terms of the biological DMARD used. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in adherence to biological therapies among patients with chronic inflammatory arthropathies. Adherence correlates negatively with administration of biological DMARD by a family member and / or caregiver.

[Postvaccinal reactions to simultaneous administration of the triple viral, oral polio and diphtheria-tetanus vaccines compared with their administration in sequence]. / Reacciones posvacunales tras la administración simultánea de vacunas triple vírica y antipolio oral-difteria-tétanos, frente a su administración secuencial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and characteristics of post-vaccination reactions, between on the one hand the simultaneous administration of the Oral Antipolio (OP), the Triple Virus (TV) and the Anti-Diphtheria and Anti-Tetanus (DT) vaccines; and on the other hand, their administration in sequence. DESIGN: Prospective study with interventions, with a non-random, non-blind determination. SITE. Survey covering the mothers of infants vaccinated at 24 vaccination centres in Mála province. PARTICIPANTS: 490 infants vaccinated during their second year of life. 263 had the vaccines administered simultaneously and 227 in sequence. INTERVENTIONS: Simultaneous administration of the TV, OP and DT vaccines at 15 months; as against the administration of TV at 15 months, followed by OP and DT at 18 months. MAIN RESULTS: 78 infants (29.66%) suffered a reaction that could be attributed to the vaccination after the simultaneous administration of TV, OP and DT; and 86 infants (37.88%) after one of the two occasions of vaccination in the administration in sequence: 27.31% after the TV, 17.18% after the OP-DT and 6.62% after both. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of simultaneous administration, taken together with data coming from other studies on its immunogenic effectiveness, reaffirms the usefulness of simultaneous administration of TV, OP and DT vaccines at 15 months, as a strategy to improve vaccine coverage of infants in their second year of life.